no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Thomas Scott (abt. 1595 - bef. 1654)

Thomas Scott aka Scoote, Skott
Born about in Rattlesden, Suffolk, Englandmap
Ancestors ancestors
Husband of — married 20 Jul 1620 in Rattlesden, Suffolk, Englandmap
Descendants descendants
Died before before about age 59 in Ipswich, Essex County, Massachusetts Bay Colonymap [uncertain]
Profile last modified | Created 13 Sep 2010
This page has been accessed 6,238 times.
The Puritan Great Migration.
Thomas Scott migrated to New England during the Puritan Great Migration (1621-1640). (See The Great Migration (Series 2), by R. C. Anderson, vol. 6, p. 209)
Join: Puritan Great Migration Project
Discuss: pgm

Contents

Merge Warning

Not to be confused with Thomas Scott of Cambridge and Hartford, Connecticut

Biography

Thomas Scoote the sonne of Henry and Martha was baptized on 26 Feb 1594/5 in Rattlesden, Suffolk, England. [1][2] Thomas was the first child of this marriage to appear in the parish register. He was the son of Henry Scott and Martha Whatlock[3]

He became a glover.[4]

He married Elizabeth Strutt on 20 July 1620 in Rattlesden, Suffolk, England. [5]

(1620) July 20 Thomas Scott and Elizabeth Strutt were Maried

The village of Rattlesden and the surrounding area was a hotbed of Puritan sentiment during much of the 16th and 17th centuries. In 1634, a local wheelwright, Richard Kemball, Thomas' brother-in-law, led a relatively large company from Rattlesden to the Massachusetts Bay Colony as part of the wave of emigration that occurred during the Great Migration.[6]

Thomas and Elizabeth, along with his mother Martha and his sister Ursula Kimball and her family, immigrated on the ship Elizabeth: "Thomas Skott," aged 40, "Elizabeth his wife," aged 40, "Martha Scott," aged 60, "Elizabeth Scott," aged 9, "Abigail Scott," aged 7 and "Thomas Scott," aged 6,[2] were enrolled at Ipswich as passengers for New England under Master Willis Andres.[3] They arrived sometime in July 1634.

They settled in Ipswich, Massachusetts Bay Colony where Thomas was granted a house-lot in 1635. 
Thomas took the Freeman’s Oath on March 4, 1634/5.[7] He was selectman of Ipswich in 1636/7, constable in 1641, served on grand juries 1645, 1648 and 1651, and on trial juries in 1647, 1649 and 1653.

The town of Ipswich sued him for debt in 1646, and he was one of Major Denison’s subscribers in 1648.[8]

Thomas died sometime between writing his will on 8 March 1653/4 and 17 Mar 1653/4, when the inventory of his estate was taken.[2]

"The will of Thomas Scott of Ipswich was made March 8, 1653/4, and proved March 28, 1654. To his daughters Elizabeth and Abigail he left £25 each, half to be paid within half a year of his decease and the rest within a year. To his daughters Hannah, Sarah, and Mary, £25 each, to be paid when they reached the age of twenty-one, but, if they married before that age, one-half was to be paid on their marriage days. Residue to son Thomas. Executors: brother Richard Kembell, Thomas Rowlinson, sr., Edmund Bridges."[9]

"The inventory of £318 lists three books, much cloth and pewter and the house, barn and land. The legacies of Sarah and Mary Scott were paid to Mr. Ezekiel Rogers for them in 1661 and 1663, and Haniell Bosworth receipted for that of his wife Abigail in 1663."[8]

Estate Inventory on 17 Mar 1653/54 valued £319-19-11; £129 in real estate.[2]

Children

  1. Elizabeth bp Rattlesden 18 Nov 1623; m by 1646 John Stofford
  2. Abigail bp Rattlesden 5 Mar 1625/6[8]; m by 8 Mar 1653/4 Daniel Bosworth
  3. Thomas bp Rattlesden 15 Ju 1628; m by 1656 Margaret Hubbard, daughter of William; he died at Ipswich 6 Sep 1657; his widow m2 Ezekiel Rogers.
  4. Benjamin bp Rattlesden 3 Feb 1670 bur there 30 Aug 1633[8]
  5. Hannah b abt 1635; m. 7 Jan 1655/5 (in Stamford, CT) Edmund Lockwood
  6. Sarah, b abt 1637; named in father's 1653 will at which time she was single; no further record.
  7. Mary b abt 1639; m by 1666 Thomas Patch; eldest child b Wenham 8 Dec 1666. (Did she d Sept 26, 1728 in Wenham?)


Research Notes

Merge caution: Thomas Scott of Ipswich needs to be distinguished from Thomas Scott of Cambridge and Hartford who was also an early immigrant. Early secondary sources mixed the records of the two men. For example, both Savage in his Genealogical Dictionary of New England and Pope in his Pioneers of Massachusetts err in combining the records of the two men.[10][11] (The ancestry of Phoebe Tilton, 1775-1847 also makes this error).[8] However, the records of these two men overlap in such a way that it is clear that they are two separate men.
Thomas Scott of Ipswich, MA was baptized in Rattlesden, England in 1594.
“The records for Thomas Scott of Cambridge are continuous from late 1634 until early 1635, whereas Thomas Scott of Ipswich was made a freeman on 4 Mar 1634/5 [MBCR 1:370], demonstrating that these were two separate men. The disappearance of Thomas Scott from Cambridge shortly before a man of the same name appeared at Hartford indicates that the records in these two towns pertain to the same man, participating in the larger migration from Cambridge to Hartford."[12]

Sources

  1. Notes on the history of the church and parish of Rattlesden, in the county of Suffolk: together with a copy of the parish registers from 1558 to 1758, and index of the marriages.
    Rev. J.R. Olorenshaw (pub. 1900) [page 241 image 274 online]
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Robert Charles Anderson, Great Migration Immigrants to New England, 1634-1635, Volume VI, R-S, Boston, MA: NEHGS (2009), Featured name: "Thomas Scott" pages 209-13. NEHGS subscription link
  3. 3.0 3.1 Holman, Mary Lovering. Ancestry of Charles Stinson Pillsbury and John Sargent Pillsbury: compiled for Helen Pendleton (Winston) Pillsbury (N.p.: n.p., 1938), pages 81-82. [View online at FamilySearch.org (online pages 91-92)
  4. Henry F. Waters, “Genealogical Gleanings In England,”The New England Historical & Genealogical Register, Vol. 52, April. 1898. Page 248. Notes: Will of Robert Whotlock 20 Sep 1622: "My kinsman, Thomas Scott of Rattlesden, glover"
  5. Notes on the history of the church and parish of Rattlesden, in the county of Suffolk: together with a copy of the parish registers from 1558 to 1758, and index of the marriages. Rev. J.R. Olorenshaw (pub. 1900) [page 263 image 296 online]
  6. Wikipedia: Rattlesden referencing: Thompson, Roger. Mobility and Migration: East Anglian Founders of New England, 1629-1640. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1994. pp 212-213
  7. Shurtleff, Nathaniel. Records of the Governor and Company of the Massachusetts Bay in New England (William White, Boston, 1853-) Vol 1, 370.
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 Davis, Walter. The Ancestry of Phoebe Tilton, 1775-1847 (The Anthoensen Press, Portland, Maine, 1947). p 118-120.
  9. Walter Goodwin Davis, The ancestry of Phoebe Tilton, 1775-1847, wife of Capt. Abel Lunt ... (Portland, Me: Anthoensen Press, 1947), 119; digital images, Hathi Trust.
  10. Savage. A Genealogical Dictionary of the First Settlers of New England, volume 4 of 4, (1862), vol. 4 page 39.
  11. Pope, Charles Henry. The Pioneers of Massachusetts (Boston, 1900): 404.
  12. Robert Charles Anderson, Great Migration Immigrants to New England, 1634-1635, Boston, MA: NEHGS (2008), vol 6, p 218. NEHGS Subscription link.

See also:

  • Barbour, Lucius Barnes, 1982, Families of Early Hartford, Connecticut, Genealogical Publishing Co. Inc., Baltimore, Maryland and Connecticut Society of Genealogists, Inc., Glastonbury, Connecticut pp.495
  • A Register of the Ancestors of Dorr Eugene Felt and Agnes (McNulty) Felt, Compiled for Dorr E. Felt, by Alfred L. Holman, Chicago, 1921, "Felt and Allied Families", Scott, Pg. 113.
  • Sanborn, George Freeman, and Melinde Lutz Sanborn. Vital Records of Hampton, New Hampshire: to the End of the Year 1900. (Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 1992).
  • Libby, Charles Thornton. Genealogical Dictionary of Maine and New Hampshire (Southward Press, Portland, Maine, 1928), Page 81.
  • Filby, P. William, ed, Passenger and Immigration Lists Index, 1500s-1900s, Farmington Hills, MI, USA: Gale Research, 2010. In Passenger and Immigration Lists Index, 1500s-1900s. Ancestry.com Place: Boston, Massachusetts; Year: 1634; Pages: 27 and 118
  • Ancestry.com. Burke’s Family Records (Indexed) [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2010.
  • Year: 1624; Yates Publishing. U.S. and International Marriage Records, 1560-1900 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2004.
  • Year: 1635; Ancestry.com. U.S. and Canada, Passenger and Immigration Lists Index, 1500s-1900s [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc, 2010.
  • Year: 1654; The Essex Institute, 1911-1975; Salem, MA, USA; Records and Files of the Quarterly Courts of Essex County, Massachusetts, Volumes 1-9; Volume: I; Page: 338
  • Year: 1654; Massachusetts, Essex County, Probate Records; Author: Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court (Essex County); Probate Place: Essex, Massachusetts
  • https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/81533956

Acknowledgements

Some of the following may have contributed data that was intended for Thomas Scott of Hartford, CT. : Liisa Small (6 June 2011), Michael Stephenson (20 Jun 2011), Betty Patterson (20 June 2011, Brian McCullough (8 Jul 2011), Masm x (7 Aug 2011), Mike Walton (20 Aug 2011), Willette Bryant (12 Sep 2011), John Putnam (12 Oct 2011), Marie Chantigny (27 Jul 13), Johanna Amnelin (5 Jul 2011), Henry Chadwick Mar 29, 2014.





Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships. Maternal line mitochondrial DNA test-takers: Have you taken a test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.


Comments: 11

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Scott-5136 and Scott-397 do not represent the same person because: Different generations
posted by Henry Chadwick
Scott-4835 and Scott-397 do not represent the same person because: Different generations
posted by Henry Chadwick
I did some merge/source clean up. I still need to check a couple of the sources to see if they're relevant to this Thomas Scott. The bio says "After a short stay in Cambridge, they settled in Ipswich." Is the reference to Cambridge continued confusion with the other Thomas Scott who went to Hartford after a brief stay in Cambridge?
posted by M Cole
GM p 212 says Cambridge record refers to Hartford man. So you can safely delete that from this profile.
Scott-17787 and Scott-397 appear to represent the same person because: attempting to merge away some made-up profiles. Have also proposed a merge of the spouses.
May I suggest that the eldest son Edmund Scott-13230 is not the son of this Thomas Scott, as Edmund is born in 1618, two years before Thomas married. There is no baptism record for Edmund in the Rattlesden parish register for that period.

Edmund may well be a duplicate of Edmund Scott-14704, who was born in 1618 in Essex, England to Thomas Scott-3511, and died in Connecticut.

Thomas Scott-3511 is also a PGM profile.

posted by Jo Fitz-Henry
Shouldn't death date be 1654, as 1653 is the Julian notation?
posted by Darlene (Scott) Kerr
Scott-9708 and Scott-397 appear to represent the same person because: Appear to be the same person except that the 1643 death is wrong.
posted by Donald Darms
Hi: Jollaine: On my watchlist my Thomas Scott was b: 1599 & died 1643. Profile was Scott 7742. So I am on the right

profile. Hope this info. is of some help..I can not find my source or documents..but if you give me some desendants to source I will help out Until later. Marie

posted by Marie Chantigny
Also, while I have attempted to merge duplicates of the children, we could still use your help de-duping descendants. Thanks!
posted by Jillaine Smith
Profile managers, please review whether or not you are PM on the correct profile now that we've detangled the knot of the two different Thomas Scotts. Before we realized we were doing so, we incorrectly merged Thomas of Ipswich with <a href="http://www.wikitree.com/index.php?title=Scott-3511">Thomas of Hartford</a>. They're detangled now, but you may have ended up PM on the wrong profile. And because we have MANY PMs on THIS profile page, if you're not going to be active on this profile, please consider downgrading yourself from PM to Trusted List. Thanks! Let me know if you need help. I'll remain on the PM of both until things settle down. -- Jillaine, Puritan Great Migration project
posted by Jillaine Smith

Featured Auto Racers: Thomas is 19 degrees from Jack Brabham, 23 degrees from Rudolf Caracciola, 16 degrees from Louis Chevrolet, 17 degrees from Dale Earnhardt, 32 degrees from Juan Manuel Fangio, 16 degrees from Betty Haig, 20 degrees from Arie Luyendyk, 17 degrees from Bruce McLaren, 18 degrees from Wendell Scott, 18 degrees from Kat Teasdale, 12 degrees from Dick Trickle and 22 degrees from Maurice Trintignant on our single family tree. Login to see how you relate to 33 million family members.

S  >  Scott  >  Thomas Scott

Categories: Puritan Great Migration | Glovers | Elizabeth, 1634 | Ipswich, Massachusetts